We Are a Solutions Sector

Christopher Hankin photo

In his blog on Thursday, ITI’s Dean Garfield quoted comments made by Google’s Eric Schmidt at the “How Green Is the Internet?” summit that we attended that day.  Now, you can view Eric’s full comments as well as all the plenary remarks from the event.  They are here, along with a two-minute overview video that gives testimony to the energy and intelligence that permeated the event.   

We also produced two quick videos of our own while at Google, though my interviewing skills aren’t going to give the TV anchors any fear for their jobs!   We asked Joyce Dickerson of Google about the event and their objectives in hosting it, and then asked Stanford’s Jon Koomey and Microsoft’s Mark Aggar to provide their thoughts on our sector’s contributions to future sustainability efforts.  Check them out.

Readers may have noticed today’s release of the new International Energy Agency (IEA) world energy outlook special report, “Redrawing the Climate Map.”  I admit I have not read yet all 100+ pages, but I am a bit underwhelmed by the four policy recommendations featured in the executive summary.  The IEA presents its “4-for-2” scenario, proposing the “implementation of four policy measures that can help keep the door open to the two degrees Celsius target through to 2020 at no net economic cost.”  These four policies are:

  • Adopting specific energy efficiency measures (49% of the emissions savings);
  • Limiting the construction and use of the least-efficient coal-powered power plants (21%);
  • Minimizing methane (CH4) emissions from upstream oil and gas production (18%); and,
  • Accelerating the (partial) phase-out of subsidies to fossil-fuel consumption (12%).

My let down is with the first bullet.  Energy efficiency is vital, and deserves to be listed first.  However, the specific measures that the IEA recommends highlight the imposition of government component efficiency standards.  Such old-think!  We have entered a new world of networked systems, with the internet of things providing vast new potential for energy efficiencies.  Yet, the IEA seems still captured by the old world of stand-alone components.

The messages from the Google summit were so much different.  Internet-enabled solutions promise much more efficiency, and governments should focus on how to help better unleash this potential.  To paraphrase Ericsson’s Elaine Weidman-Grunewald’s remarks at the end of Google’s overview video, we are a solutions sector, and we’re very optimistic about that.

Back
Share this post on:
12 comments
  • Mateusz Sat., December 21, 2:29 PM
    This is the pefrect post for me to find at this time http://zcfjyjeofxo.com [url=http://ppbezqgsuv.com]ppbezqgsuv[/url] [link=http://brayfwgfcen.com]brayfwgfcen[/link]
  • Andre Sat., December 21, 2:09 PM
    The world is awash in natural gas, and will be for dcedaes, that is why some drillers are losing money. It is called a glut. It is only a glut if they keep drilling the uneconomic marginal plays, which is the shale formations. You assume that companies will keep wasting investor capital by producing natural gas at a loss. I do not believe that can go on for very long in a world where gas depletion for new wells is running at 50% per year and the ultimate recovery rates are much lower than assumed. This is why the gas players have gotten killed and are now trying to raise capital to drill for shale liquids.Huge strikes are being made everywhere (thnk Indonesia) and then add to that shale. Eni just announced a shale deal with China. China has a large land mass, crickey-almighty who knows what they have? I am very interested in the conventional gas strikes but do not believe that the shale gas is economic. That means that I would rather be looking for gas in Mexico rather than ND or New York. The idea is to make money by getting a decent return, not to keep producing for a loss and letting management siphon off your capital through high salaries. The problem with many remote locations is transport. You need to be close to your market or to have huge amounts of capital for GTL or LNG conversion. Both tend to reduce returns significantly, which means that around one third of the energy will be wasted during the conversion process. Right now, Methanex sells methanol at ${esc.dollar}1.25 a gallon (roughly ${esc.dollar}2.50 a gallon BTU equivalent).Methanol is used as feedstock in chemical production. It would not surprise me to see Methanex take advantage of some of these discoveries and build a plant near the fields as it has done in the past. But the gains to the producers and consumers will not be as great as they are for Methanex or similar players that take advantage and move their plants to where the gas is.That's before the enormous economies of scale that would occur if methanol ever went mainstream. Unless you are a drag racer or Monster Truck driver chances are that you will not be using methanol as a fuel due to its volatility and corrosive properties. Peak Oil is a non-story. Peak Demand for fossil crude may the story of the next 20 years.But it isn't even a story yet. And that is even though we know that the production of light sweet peaked in 2005 and have seen prices near ${esc.dollar}100 in the past week. That's the old, old story on all commodities--they go bust sooner or later.I think that the fiat currencies and the sovereign bond markets are more likely to go bust sooner or later. If you are not ready and refuse to take steps to protect yourself you have nothing to blame but your own ignorance. http://psebfiuf.com [url=http://wvwqfmvly.com]wvwqfmvly[/url] [link=http://rargyunol.com]rargyunol[/link]
  • Yulia Mon., December 16, 2:44 PM
    This is both street smart and inilnltgeet.
  • Klaus Mon., December 16, 2:30 PM
    Your posting really stitegharned me out. Thanks!
  • Dante Mon., December 16, 1:35 PM
    We need more inishgts like this in this thread. http://eoprathqor.com [url=http://rppjizeicc.com]rppjizeicc[/url] [link=http://anwftegux.com]anwftegux[/link]
  • Atiqah Mon., December 16, 7:12 AM
    Fidning this post has solved my problem http://nybuyvteegc.com [url=http://jiwciqfyzy.com]jiwciqfyzy[/url] [link=http://gpigmpmpwc.com]gpigmpmpwc[/link]
  • Kesatria Sat., December 14, 9:12 AM
    Holy conscie data batman. Lol!
  • Sebastian Sat., December 14, 2:57 AM
    I had no idea how to approach this bee-fronow I'm locked and loaded.
  • Vaibhav Thu., December 12, 10:44 PM
    Got it! Thanks a lot again for henilpg me out!
  • Abdul Thu., December 12, 6:54 PM
    You've imeepssrd us all with that posting!
  • Miguel Mon., August 12, 5:29 PM
    I came across your wesitbe and realised who it is that is currently feeding the taxpayers alliance their mouth full of BS about GPs profiteering , the greedy opportunists! -pot, kettle-black!!! are you like Matthew(elliot) a privately educated snob setting out to dismantle the NHS and ensure only the rich privileged few have access to quality health care? Your businesses couldn't possibly stand to benefit from private public partnerships in the nhs,are you a millionaire yet or just pinning your flag to the TPA mast in the hope of becoming one??? must say you bunch of elitist blue noses are currently managing to pass your selves off as ordinary tax payers in the press. I do have faith however that although us underprivileged masses didn't all enjoy private education we can see through people like you. Even though you cannot follow your own mantras on TRANSPARENCY!
  • LOpaug Fri., August 2, 10:50 PM
    / Too many bloggers are seitntg themselves up for disaster and a long life complete of pain if they don't soon start off to comprehend that it is pretty important to maintain in mind your posture even though you slave away writing blog posts and articles all day! If you have a desk job or perform on the net like I do, there's a high chance you may well develop sciatica or other back pain difficulties. I suffered with this issue for years, but I lastly found a which gave me full extended relief.. It's taken pretty much a complete year of everyday function to get it back to full wellness once again, but having no pain is absolutely something that I am thankful for each and every day! I've just been reaching out to other bloggers and webmasters lately trying to share this information and facts due to the fact I was able to stay clear of a nasty and risky surgery by following the strategies on that internet site. I hope you do not have back pain, but I know that even if you do not, you will almost certainly know a person who does. In which case, I hope you can forward them this data! It actually did save me a LOT of pain!!
(HTML not permitted)
Captcha
* - Required