Talking Tax Reform with Intel Innovators

Robert Hoffman photo

Prior to participating in a discussion with employees at Intel Corporation in Santa Clara, Calif., House Ways & Means Chairman Dave Camp and Senate Finance Chairman Max Baucus were given a brief tour of the Intel Museum.  Among the many innovations created by this iconic company was the 386 microprocessor, a 32-bit chip that made it possible for personal computers to run more than one software application at the same time, providing multitasking capability and, along with it, the foundation for the Windows 3.0 operating system.

Released in 1985, the 386 was an important milestone in advancing the U.S. information technology industry, but, like so many cutting edge innovations, it became obsolete.  It was replaced by faster, more complex processors that stimulated further innovation. 

When it comes to maintaining a competitive edge, the U.S. Congress could learn from dynamic technology companies like Intel.  At the same time Intel was launching the 386, Congress was passing what would be the last major re-write of our U.S. tax code. 

Like the 386, the 1986 tax reform law was a major innovation and a catalyst for significant economic activity.  One of its key achievements was a significant reduction in the corporate rate – from 46 percent to 34 percent (it was adjusted to 35 percent as part of the 1993 deficit reduction deal), one of the lowest corporate tax rates in the world at the time.  And just as Intel’s business competitors reacted with innovations to counter the 386, America’s global competitors modernized their tax codes, lowering their corporate tax rates and making the U.S. code increasingly obsolete.

This massive global competition for investment and jobs was a recurring theme in Chairmen Baucus’ and Camp’s conversations with Intel employees.  Chairman Baucus noted that other countries have lowered their corporate rates in order to gain an edge in job creation and to make their domestic companies more competitive in global markets.  He and Chairman Camp both agreed that reducing the corporate tax rate has to be the centerpiece of any broad-based reform of the code.

One Intel employee asked the lawmakers if they supported making the U.S. tax code reflect the market-based systems most developed countries have adopted.  Both chairmen agreed, stating that a modern tax system must be market-based if U.S. companies are to compete with foreign companies that are already benefitting from similar systems.  Chairman Camp noted that, unlike most of their foreign competitors, American companies are subject to taxation twice on their foreign profits – first in the country where they are earned and then again in the United States.  

This potential for two large tax bills is part of the reason why an estimated $1.7 trillion in U.S. corporate earnings remain locked overseas.  Chairman Camp believes tax reform is imperative if Congress wants to encourage these trapped earnings to be invested in the U.S.  The longer it takes for Congress to enact tax reform, he argues, the greater the risk U.S. companies will invest that money overseas.

Intel’s innovators emphasized the importance of preserving effective tax incentives, and specifically highlighted the research-and-development (R&D) credit.  Intel Chief Financial Officer Stacy Smith pointed out that Intel invested $10 billion in domestic R&D, more than any U.S. publicly traded company. 

The R&D credit is a key reason why companies like Intel do a majority of their R&D work in the U.S., even though they sell more of their goods and services outside the U.S.  Chairman Baucus agreed that the R&D credit has been an important incentive that needs to also be modernized in order to keep pace with investment incentives offered by other countries.

Just as a computer with a 386 chip as its central processing unit would be today an information technology outlier, an economy with the 1986 tax code as its central policy unit is an economic growth outlier.  Fortunately, Chairmen Camp and Baucus received a reaffirmation of that point of view from Intel’s innovators.  The chairmen encouraged those assembled to get involved, make their views known, and to help them innovate on tax policy as Intel has done with information technology.

Back
Share this post on:
5 comments
  • Bill Wed., December 25, 6:28 AM
    MikeJ / I am old and I did my best work as a scientist/engineer on NT I put up NT4 on a new box just for the nogialsta. Your offer of sp6a is a God-send! Thank you so much. I am in your debt. http://nptnaaa.com [url=http://xrqholknfnh.com]xrqholknfnh[/url] [link=http://dcwcjtfvfvf.com]dcwcjtfvfvf[/link]
  • Chris Sun., December 22, 9:53 AM
    Guys!! This game is the love of my childhood! I can't eserpxs how happy I am to see KaM Remake! I extend my deepest gratitude to the whole team I'm so emotional right now I can't thank you enough!!! Thank you soo much for working on this and I hope you make it even better! I'm a student in a foreign country right now, otherwise I would've donated a regular portion of my salary to this game's development! I'm playing your Remake almost everyday on multiplayer these days and the hours of joy that it brings me I owe them all to you! Thank you and keep it up !
  • Soen Sat., December 21, 5:11 AM
    Hi Krom, Hi Lewin and Hi all KaM fan When i and my brother was young in the 90 s years our first game is the ongiiral KAM merchant we are played the game oncountable hours! I have got the ongiiral game Cd and the ongiiral Retail box. I'm a really KAM veteran! After many years one of my favorite games is still the KAM!I gladly see you are doing a great job with this game!I think only one thing is missing in the game. I know hard to take a new building in the game! But i always misses the alternative mod to make coal in the game!A coking plant maybe will be great! I have god a tip: why not modify the sawill as like the woodcutter. In the woodcutter we can change to plant forest and remove trees, or only remove trees! In the sawill maybe can make woodplank or can make coal i know is not the best but it's only an ideal!Sorry my bad english, i hope you can understand what i want to say! http://qocmrg.com [url=http://tewtgjxy.com]tewtgjxy[/url] [link=http://dacdyfxf.com]dacdyfxf[/link]
  • Edina Sat., December 21, 12:17 AM
    Thanks for your message.Does your ping spike (suddenly go much high) when that hnpaeps? If so it could be a problem with your internet connection losing packets. If all player's ping spikes at the same time then it's probably a problem with the server. Well known servers on solid hosts (e.g. SpecialAttack) shouldn't have any problems, but if somebody is hosting a server from their home it could lag. If a player's ping goes much higher that could mean they are causing the lag, for example if somebody else in their house starts watching Youtube and slows their internet connection a lot.It could also be your computer lagging (or some other player's computer) if it's old. Press F11 while playing and look at the FPS (frames per second) display in the bottom of the screen. It should stay above 20 otherwise you might be causing lag. Playing on a lower resolution and not zooming out will help keep your FPS high. Unfortunately at the moment if just one player has a slow computer giving a low FPS it will cause the game to lag for everybody. We plan to show when a player is causing lag like this so other players know why it is lagging and the lagging player can fix the problem.It could be something else that is causing your problem, these kind of issues are complicated but we'd really like to fix it. We appreciate your message. Let us know if we can help you further or if you have any more information that might help us solve these issues
  • Ares Thu., December 19, 6:00 PM
    Bob Greene / As recently as September 12, 2012, a geetanmln who identified himself as MikeJ , a scientist/engineer on NT responded, leaving a note of thanks. Is there any way to send email to MikeJ? Or could you send Mike my email address, with a request that he email me?
(HTML not permitted)
Captcha
* - Required