One Thing Is Certain: Immigration Reform = Economic Growth

Andy Halataei photo

In terms of legislative process, the path forward for immigration reform remains a work in progress.  In terms of economic impact, the path forward for our country if immigration reform becomes law is crystal clear:  The United States will experience increased productivity, new businesses and jobs, and a revitalized, more innovative economy.

A new White House report  outlines the potential economic benefits that would come to our country if Congress fixed our broken, outdated immigration system.  Just as important, the report also juxtaposes the clear benefits of action with the sobering costs of inaction. 

Take our industry as an example.  Left with the status quo, tens of thousands of highly skilled, U.S.-educated professionals will remain in legal and professional limbo, stuck in a green-card backlog that limits their professional advancement and prevents their being able to start businesses and create new jobs.  Given that uncertainty, the clear winners are and will continue to be other countries, ranging from Chile to Canada, that are actively recruiting skilled professionals to achieve their professional ambitions outside the United States.

The green-card reforms in the Senate-passed immigration bill would reinvigorate entrepreneurial innovation in the U.S., and nearly every economic study has shown that additional green cards for entrepreneurs and advanced-degree graduates in science, technology, engineering, and math would create new businesses and jobs across the country.

Indeed, the breadth and depth of research in the White House report, by itself, is compelling.  Just review the footnotes and you’ll see research data and findings from organizations like the American Enterprise Institute and the Center for American Progress, as well as the perspectives of economists and thought leaders from across the political spectrum. 

Today’s report helps to reinforce the real question for Congress.  It’s not “Immigration Reform, yes or no?”  It’s “Immigration Reform, Now or Later?”  Given the critical issue of our future economic security and competitiveness, the time for immigration reform is now.

Share this post on:
  • Naztia Sun., December 22, 1:46 AM
    Regarding visas for international stdeunts, while I agree that in some instances visas are very difficult for some stdeunts in particular countries to get,and sometimes it seems to relate to particular immigration employees, I do not believe that getting visas is the difficult part. The area I think the sector needs to have a full conversation on is regarding those stdeunts having not performed or not having had the required attendance being able to stay in the country and attend another institution.I understand that the policy in theory means that a student must return home and then apply again but in reality this does not occur and there are many international stdeunts still in New Zealand, having either abandoned a course or been withdrawn through not attending or participating. These stdeunts are rorting the system and Immigration needs to make sure their database systems align with MOE ones in order to identify these stdeunts who should be either enrolled or returned home. [url=]pidvrivipc[/url] [link=]euxjwxu[/link]
  • Putipuerco Sat., December 21, 10:59 AM
    CRI see all the comment reemovd' posts. That must be you. LOL.The people on that site are liberal ziotards.I'm not suprised.I just watched the Klitchko fight on talmudvision. A mostly White crowd (English) was cheering for the nigger. What can you expect when jews like larry merchant, michael buffer,bert sugar, etc..have gained full control of boxing?But I see your point.A couple times , I got involved with other Incog posters in flooding threads like that. I see much good in it and I plan to do it again.
  • Zouhair Wed., December 18, 3:36 PM
    It is done when the government isseus bonds. For example the US government isseus Treasury Bills and Notes that anyone can purchase. When countries hold Foreign Exchange reserves they don't actually hold cash. They hold bonds so that they can make interest. When a foreign country buys the bonds they bought our debt.Yes they can sell our debt (bonds) to anyone at anytime.No, they cannot force us to pay the debt at anytime, only when the bond matures (ie. a 30-year bond expires in 30 years)
  • Santiago Tue., December 17, 2:24 AM
    Do people know that if all debt was paid off iulcnding the government there would be no cash in circulation?It is time for the government to spend in our debt based system. The cycle is back and we the people lose a little more every time. Watch, next will be the companies spending then the people again like in the late 90s. Reagan had to spend his butt off to with programs like Star Wars. But when we call it a stimulus package today.
(HTML not permitted)
* - Required