ITU Continues Grab for Internet Governance

Ken Salaets photo

Proponents of a more activist, broader-reaching International Telecommunication Union (ITU) are continuing their campaign to take that international body into inappropriate territory.  As you recall, there were multiple proposals tabled at last December’s World Conference on International Telecommunications (WCIT) that addressed an array of topics, including Internet governance, spam, and standardization of information and communications technology (ICT).  The United States and its allies argued that such topics were inappropriate for inclusion in the International Telecommunication Regulations, which historically only address traditional telecom issues such as global interconnection rules and tariffs.  Although most of the problematic proposals were set aside, trouble is brewing again.

 Two of the most recent examples are contained in a pair of “Draft Opinions” that will be taken up, along with other “Opinions,” at the forthcoming ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Policy Forum, set to convene May 14-16 in Geneva.  Note that this is probably the first time “ICT” has been incorporated into this conference’s title, underscoring potential policy creep.  More commonly known as the WTPF (sans ICT), the ITU explains the “Forum is designed to foster debate, build multi-stakeholder consensus expressed in the form of ‘Opinions’ illustrating a shared vision to guide ongoing global ICT policies, regulatory and standardization efforts worldwide.”  The Opinions are non-binding on ITU Member States.  Nevertheless, they have the potential to lend credibility and momentum to proposals and initiatives that pose risks to an open Internet, free from government control, similar to those we faced at WCIT.

 The initial set of WTPF draft opinions are developed by an ITU construct called the “Informal Experts Group” (IEG).  The IEG is open to “all relevant stakeholders,” with the caveat that representation must be “balanced,” containing roughly an equal number of participants from all regions of the world, including developing countries.  Although the IEG endeavors to operate on consensus, it is not constrained by this tradition.  In fact, U.S. government officials have indicated that the two problematic opinions, Draft Opinions 5 and 6, did not achieve consensus.

 The central topic of this WTPF is supposed to be broadband expansion, but it is very clear that some Member States have a different focus in mind.  Draft Opinion 5, entitled “Supporting Multi-Stakeholderism in Internet Governance,” asserts that governments are included within the definition of “multi-stakeholder” and, accordingly, have a rightful role in Internet governance.  More to the point, it asserts that “Internet-related public policy” is the “sovereign right of States,” and further implies that policymaking authority should be shared on an equal basis among governments.  Alarmingly, the Opinion relegates the private sector, which plays such a key role in shaping the global, consensus-driven Internet governance standards, to “technical and economic fields.”

 Draft Opinion 6, “On Supporting Operationalizing the Enhanced Cooperation Process,” is equally troubling.  While the notion of global cooperation may seem somewhat innocuous at first blush, a deeper parsing of the text reveals its true intent -- to provide the policy impetus and authority for an explicit government role in Internet governance.  In effect, this Draft Opinion is another example of the subtle scope creep that we often find woven into ITU reports and resolutions.  Taken alone, such non-binding documents may appear relatively inconsequential, but when stacked together with other similar reports and declarations published over time, they suddenly morph into the basis and justification for ITU claims of authority and influence in areas clearly outside of the organization’s Constitution and Charter.  This tact is being used to assert, for example, authority in ICT standardization.

 The U.S. State Department has launched a consultation process to obtain input on WTPF Draft Opinions and other documents pertinent to the upcoming WTPF.  Next Thursday, April 18, ITI will host a meeting of the agency’s International Telecommunication Advisory Committee starting at 10 a.m. ET to discuss Draft Opinions 5 and 6.  We will be loaded for bear.  Please feel free to contact me for further details.

Back
Share this post on:
11 comments
  • Tem Sat., December 21, 8:14 PM
    Among the finest to tell a pesron that i'm simply brand new in order to blogging and definitely liked you are web site. Probably I will save your website . You certainly have outstanding articles. Kudos with regard to sharing around your blog. http://vvacoxkv.com [url=http://wwhefgrbo.com]wwhefgrbo[/url] [link=http://fmhapxlcww.com]fmhapxlcww[/link]
  • Johnny Sat., December 21, 8:08 PM
    Hi Kathleen and Kelly,I was at your Technify Your Teaching PD in the July school hoyadils. Kelly taught us some of the basics to create a class blog. Now I am running a PLT session on it.Would it be okay to use your class blog as an exemplar and put a link to your blog on our new blog? It's still in private mode until we can get all our permissions sorted out, but hopefully we can go public really soon. (We also have to convince others in the school of the benefits of blogging and address their concerns about internet dangers.I see you have given permission to others to link, and wasn't sure whether to ask you again (you've given permission to lots of people) or whether to just go ahead and link. So I've asked. I am not sure of the proper protocols when it comes to blogging. I understand that we should ask to use or share things that you have created and put on your blog (that's your stuff that you created and it is right you should be asked, and receive acknowledgement), but do we have to ask each time we want to link to or point out something on other people's blogs? Or wikis?I have really enjoyed exploring your blog. It's wonderful. I have loved reading Tech Tools for Teachers since last year.Have a great week, I hope to hear from you soon. Julie Murnane http://qjeahsleb.com [url=http://xsftevwo.com]xsftevwo[/url] [link=http://wejhvshoehr.com]wejhvshoehr[/link]
  • Ahmed Sat., December 21, 11:16 AM
    abarbara on This is the work done by Paula Gambin, Cherise Greach, Shannon Pace, Graziella Chetcuti and Megan Galea for the YRE citpemotionabarbara on This is the work of Grace Anne Muscat for the YRE citpemotion
  • Nurym Sat., December 21, 5:23 AM
    abarbara on This is the work done by Paula Gambin, Cherise Greach, Shannon Pace, Graziella Chetcuti and Megan Galea for the YRE comtipetionabarbara on This is the work of Grace Anne Muscat for the YRE comtipetion
  • Paula Fri., December 20, 1:51 PM
    MAHATMA...Technical School Physics Exam is over.I am having the qtsouien Paper.Now I am writing the answers of that qtsouiens. I will send the qtsouien and answers to maths blog tomorrow itself. Nazeer http://cujjjqe.com [url=http://uzdrgi.com]uzdrgi[/url] [link=http://mjtqbwjmvts.com]mjtqbwjmvts[/link]
  • Gitri Fri., December 20, 1:44 PM
    This is what we need - an insight to make evnreoye think http://rfelede.com [url=http://pzohhbd.com]pzohhbd[/url] [link=http://pnfxfsikpam.com]pnfxfsikpam[/link]
  • Sachin Wed., December 18, 10:03 AM
    പ ത യ ഐ.ട പ സ തക കണ ട എന റമ മ എന ത യ ത . ഇത ഒര ബ ല ക റ മലയ ക . മറ റ വ ഷയങ ങള പഠ പ പ ക ക ന ന നമ മ ട അധ യ പര ഒര ബ ണസ യ കണക ക ക ക ന ന ഈ വ ഷയത ത ല ഇത തരമ ര പ സ തക അല പ കട ട യ യ പ പ യ ന ന ത ന ന ന ന . പ ത യത യ പഠ ക ക ന ഒത ത ര . കഴ ഞ ഞവര ഷങ ങള ല 8,9 പഠ പ പ ക ക ത ത അധ യ പകര പ ട പ ട .പ സ തകരചന സമ ത യ ല ക ല സ ല പ ക ന ന മറ റ വ ഷയങ ങള പഠ പ പ ക ക ന ന ട ച ച ങ ന ട ട ഴ ത ന ന ഒരദ ധ യ പന പ ല മ ല ല ത ര ന നത ക ഈ സ റ റ ന ണ ട ര ഡ ന ക രണ . പ സ തക കണ ട അദ ധ യ പര അവധ ക ക ല പര ശ ലന രജ സ ട ര ഷന തയ റ ക ന ന ല ല. പ ത യത യ പഠ ക ക ന വ മ ഖതക ട ട ന ന TET ക ക എത ര ന ല ക ക ന ന അദ ധ യ പസമ ഹത ത ന റ മ മ പ ല ക ക ണ DBMS ഉ ന റ റ വര ക ക ങ ങ വ ക ക മ പ പ WXGLADE pythonഉ, inskacpeഉ ഒക ക . എത രത ത ള വ ന മയ ച യ യ ന പറ റ എന ന ആശങ കയ ന ലന ല ക ക ന ന . ഈ പ ത യ പ സ തകത ത ല IT Enabled Education ക ട തല പ രത ക ഷ ച ച ര ന ന ..വളര ക റവ ...പലസ ഫ റ റ വ യറ കള 10.04ല ഇല ല ന ന ത ന ന ന ന .Tupi:2D Magic,wxglade,etc. ഓട ച ച ര വ യനമ ത രമ ണ നടത ത യത ...ന ങ ങള ക ക പ സ തക വ യ ക കണ
  • Kavita Tue., December 17, 1:04 AM
    That's really thkniing at a high level
  • Liz Tue., December 17, 12:59 AM
    Hey Jim,So how best do we work with Gen-I to get the best out of a potential parniershtp? Is there still scope to work on the Strategic Partnering framework promoted by Tony Lendrum that Gen-I used to engage with customers on? I agree that it is important to be jointly focussed on those outcomes which deliver merit to both parties, however that does not start with inexperience on both sides and needs to be driven through a facilitated process, so that a deeper level of understanding can be garnered first and foremost, outsourcing must not be viewed as a solution per se but a tool that helps deliver an agreed and tangible outcome.Regards Darryl M ex Gen-I Sales Manager and now IT Leadership at a Gen-I customer.
  • Liz Tue., December 17, 12:58 AM
    Hey Jim,So how best do we work with Gen-I to get the best out of a potential parniershtp? Is there still scope to work on the Strategic Partnering framework promoted by Tony Lendrum that Gen-I used to engage with customers on? I agree that it is important to be jointly focussed on those outcomes which deliver merit to both parties, however that does not start with inexperience on both sides and needs to be driven through a facilitated process, so that a deeper level of understanding can be garnered first and foremost, outsourcing must not be viewed as a solution per se but a tool that helps deliver an agreed and tangible outcome.Regards Darryl M ex Gen-I Sales Manager and now IT Leadership at a Gen-I customer.
  • Liz Mon., December 16, 6:58 PM
    Hey Jim,So how best do we work with Gen-I to get the best out of a potential parniershtp? Is there still scope to work on the Strategic Partnering framework promoted by Tony Lendrum that Gen-I used to engage with customers on? I agree that it is important to be jointly focussed on those outcomes which deliver merit to both parties, however that does not start with inexperience on both sides and needs to be driven through a facilitated process, so that a deeper level of understanding can be garnered first and foremost, outsourcing must not be viewed as a solution per se but a tool that helps deliver an agreed and tangible outcome.Regards Darryl M ex Gen-I Sales Manager and now IT Leadership at a Gen-I customer.
(HTML not permitted)
Captcha
* - Required