Good Steps to Transparency, Privacy Safeguards

Dean C. Garfield photo

We welcome the constructive steps that President Obama outlined today to improve the transparency and openness of the nation’s surveillance programs.  We not only support greater transparency on the part of government, but also greater discretion on the part of business to be more transparent about their responses to government surveillance requests.  These are important steps not just to increase greater public awareness about the role of surveillance programs in the U.S., but also to ensure that government collection of private data follows specific rules and guidelines.  

The Administration needs to restore trust in and expand the understanding about how these government surveillance programs operate.  Greater transparency will go far.  So will better explanations of the program’s scope and structure, as well as the safeguards in place to protect individual privacy and prevent abuse. 

The tech sector takes seriously our role in protecting our customers’ privacy and protecting their data.  However, the recent discussions around privacy often have merged what should be distinct policy implications of data collection by the private sector versus data collection for government purposes.  These issues need to be kept separate. 

We hope the Administration’s engagement also can occur at an international level, and ensure that efforts are not made to use current events to create barriers to the free flow of data and commerce across national boundaries.  Several nations are accelerating forced localization proposals that would close their borders to U.S.-designed and built technologies.  A recent ITIF study estimates that the U.S. cloud computing industry alone could lose between as much as $35 billion as a result of the recent government surveillance disclosures.  And that’s likely a conservative estimate.  

We will continue to work with the White House and Congress, others in the business community, and leaders of the privacy community to ensure that both privacy and security are achieved.

Share this post on:
  • Andy Tue., October 1, 9:40 PM
    The Commission in its communication from 3rd January ltiesd France, UK, Spain, Belgium, Denmark, Estonia, Latvia and the Czek Republic as countries with data retention laws that match the EU requirements. The German law was only published on 31st December and not included by the Commission. You can add this, making it nine now.Some information was collected by a European meeting we had with EDRi in August, see . [url=]hqskujslo[/url] [link=]azvxmdgj[/link]
  • Prandika Mon., September 30, 5:03 PM
    giati pistevei kenias pws prokeite na to plhrwsh o panikas to prostimo?ola ginonte gia eklogiko-epoikoinwniakoys logous.kai sthn kalyterh periptwsh 8a to xrewsh sto tameio ths nomarxias me to skeptiko oti etrexe gia douleia ths nomarxias.zoume se mia xwra me politikous karagiozhdes kai enw to exoume parei xampari oloi kanoume pws den vlepoume na mhn mas poune vlakes.ade na dw pote 8a ksypnhsoume epitelous. [url=]xxtzxi[/url] [link=]obcjujnf[/link]
  • Wacky Mon., September 30, 4:01 AM
    It would be very interesting to see how this map craemops with other metrics such as increases/decreases in population, income, and even immigrant population. My father-in-law died the slow, painful death of complications related to diabetes and it's sickening to think that same fate is awaiting an alarmingly increasing percentage of people.As a parting thought (and please pardon the morbidity) it is illegal to commit suicide in this country unless it's done slowly over time sucking high fructose corn syrup through a drinking straw.
  • Ntombi Sun., September 29, 1:23 PM
    Some channels were tuenrd off because they were overloaded. We are working to add them back.Някои канали са изключени, защото те са претоварени.Ние се стремим да ги добавите обратно.
(HTML not permitted)
* - Required