China Craters ITA Expansion Talks

John Neuffer photo

Dateline GENEVA:  After much erratic and obstructionist behavior by China over the course of the last ten days, it has just blown up the negotiations to expand product coverage of the Information Technology Agreement (ITA).  In a high-level meeting between the United States and China this afternoon, Beijing’s negotiators said they have zero mandate to move off their tepid list of import-sensitive products.  At a technical working group meeting of all the negotiating parties that immediately followed, China claimed it had exhausted all its resources and its flexibilities have come to an end.

At an anticipated meeting of Ambassadors later this evening, it is expected the break down in talks will be formalized.

This obviously leaves the other negotiating teams with a decidedly sour taste in their mouths.  Negotiators from all over the world were here and ready to close the deal this week.  China has been the spoiler. Its negotiators came to Geneva with a painfully low level of ambition, even though the Chinese would have been massive beneficiaries of a strong ITA expansion outcome. 

In addition, global industry has to be thinking through what this collapse foretells for China as a potential participation in other multilateral talks, such as the Trade in Services Agreement (TISA). 

Trade talks are about giving and taking.  For the past week-and-a-half negotiators here have been giving concessions, knowing they would be able to take away benefits.  China was ignoring the first half of the equation.  As the biggest tech exporter in the world, China naturally wants to see tariffs on those products in other markets eliminated.  But it also wants to use tariffs to protect its industries from imported products.  This have-your-cake-and-eat-it-too approach to trade is at the heart of this collapse in ITA expansion talks.


Back
Share this post on:
4 comments
  • Mohamed Wed., December 25, 6:24 AM
    Hi Prof. Provines,I like your blog. I am already prcctiaing all the finer points I learnt in your class. In recent past, I was negotiating a technical issue about our product with our customer. As the discussions progressed, I realized the” value” of our product in final assembly. I also realized that our sales team had quoted price of the product based on point ${esc.hash} 8 in your blog. I “value mapped” the product (${esc.hash}9) and was able create a win-win situation for my company as well as our customer. I am from the “operations” side of business but after this incident, I am invited as “technical expert” in high volume initial contract negotiations.I realize that majority of the industries are under-pricing their products and that pricing strategies need to be reviewed periodically to adjust with dynamic business conditions. http://mconss.com [url=http://vnnreitaq.com]vnnreitaq[/url] [link=http://uguwvo.com]uguwvo[/link]
  • Rafaela Sun., December 22, 9:44 AM
    您好,我是在港中大讀書的內地學生 我沒拜讀過您的著作 來年不做中國人 所以不知道您到底是對自己 中國人 這樣身份的排斥 還是對現階段中國內地在政治和社會上存在的腐敗的抵制 但是 不管您持怎樣的觀點 冷靜 全方位地看待事情的全過程是很必要的 尤其是您這種站在風口浪尖的人物 您的一句話 可能就會激起社會的千層浪 影響很多人的思緒 您有責任確保自己觀點的客觀性嚴謹性 況且 您也不希望看到自己的觀點被他人抓到漏洞 被反駁 甚至被批判吧 本文貌似就沒做到這一點 的確 法国品Zadig & Voltaire總裁Thierry Gillier在接受Women's Wear Daily採訪時確實說過 It The new high-end hotel won't be open to Chinese toriusts 這樣的話 但是呢 人家事後就立即將該報道的"Chinese toriusts"改為"busloads of toriusts 巴士載的遊客 " 而且 該事件于內地鬧出風波后 這位Gillier先生于近日還正式發表了道歉聲明 指出該採訪並未反映出自己想表達的真正意思 他只是想強調該酒店是 intimate 私隱性的 不適合于 mass tourism 團體旅遊 而已 姑且不論這位Gillier先生是否真正歧視中國國籍人士 按照他的講法 我猜測 可能是中國內地遊客給法國人旅遊團的印象太深了吧 總是一批一批地出現 當然 若歧視真存在 作為一名內地人 對該事件進行反思的話 某種程度上 我是認同您的觀點的 目前中國內地民眾的整體素質確實有待提高 現階段 我們還是有不少人愛在公眾場合大聲喧嘩 不過 希望您這樣的風雲人物可以在看到整件事情經過的基礎上 冷靜思考 再發表言論 請勿斷章取義 一味地做煽情表演 : Women's Wear Daily: telegraph.co.uk
  • Caelii Sat., December 21, 12:08 AM
    That's a slick answer to a chlngealing question
  • Rey Thu., December 19, 4:13 PM
    nothing about Kevin not being able to enter the drawing too etiehr way, no matter what, someone else will enjoy the sandals!Great content today good stuff!Merry Christmas everyone, you too Daniel!Coach Collard December 23, 2009
(HTML not permitted)
Captcha
* - Required